Evaluating Mohammad Ismail Mahallati's Political thought based on Thomas A. Spragens theoretical framework

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Researcher at Supreme National Defense University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The main concern of this article is to explain political thought of Mohammad Ismail Mahallati within a conceptual and methodological approach and the application of the theory of constitutional government in the analysis of the interaction between religion and government. The main question of this article is how Mahallati finds the crisis of the political order in the Qajar period and what ideal prescription does he offer to get out of it? In this regard, the author by descriptive-analytical method, uses the theoretical framework of Thomas Spragens in the book “Understanding Political Theory “to explain the hypothesis of the article. The crisis of tyranny arising from the disregard for the necessities of the Shari'a forms the main hypothesis of the text, and in such historical circumstances the political thought of Mahallati has matured. Mahallati believes the ideal model is Imams government, so, due to a realistic view in the absence of Imams, the solution in anti-authoritarianism in building power is reforming the government based on reducing the authoritarian rule and establishing a constitutional government.

Keywords

Barzegar, Ibrahim (2004). The Question of Palestine in the Political Thought of Contemporary Islam and the Spragens Research Methodology, Journal of Legal and Political Research, Year 6, No. 12.
Derakhsheh, Jalal (2005). The Relationship between Law and Sharia in Political Thought Allameh Mirzaei Naeini, Fall and Winter, No. 2, Political Science.
Enayat, Hamid (1986). Political Thoughts in Contemporary Islam, Second Edition, translated by Baha'uddin Khorramshad, Tehran: Kharazmi.
Mahallati, Mohammad Ismail (1998a). Guide the worshipers to the buildings of the country.
Mahallati, Mohammad Ismail (1998b). Al-Laali is relevant in the obligation of the constitution.
Mahallati, Mohammad Ismail (2000). It means constitutional monarchy or discovering the truth of constitutionalism.
Najafi, Musa (2000a). Najaf and the Philosophy of Modernity in Iran, Tehran, Institute of Islamic Culture and Thought.
Najafi, Musa (2000 b). Foundation of Political Philosophy in Iran during the Constitutional Era, Tehran, University Jihad, 1997.
Naeini, Mohammad Hossein (1999). Tanbih al-Alameh and Tanzih al-Mullah, with explanations by Seyyed Mahmoud Taleghani, Tehran: Anteshar Co.
Raja'i, Farhang (1994). The Battle of Worldviews, Tehran: Book Revival.
Sharif Kashani, Mohammad Mehdi (1983). Accidental events in the times, by the efforts of Mansoureh Etehadiyeh, and corrected by Sirus Saadvandian, Tehran, History of Iran.
Spragens, Thomas (1991). Understanding Political Theories, translated by Farhang Rajaei, Tehran: Agah Publishing Institute.
Turkman Muhammad (1990). Supervision of the Mujtahid Board: The Evolution of the Implementation of the Second Principle of the Constitutional Amendment in the Second Legislative Period, Contemporary History of Iran, Tehran, Institute of Cultural Research and Studies, Book II.
Zargarinejad, Gholam Hossein (1998). Essays on Constitutionalism, Tehran, Kavir.